The FIFA World Cup 2026 is shaping up to be one of the most ambitious tournaments in soccer history, expanding to 48 teams and spanning three countries: the United States, Mexico, and Canada. As the countdown continues—with the event kicking off on June 11, 2026—fans around the world are buzzing with excitement. But for Chicago, a city with a rich soccer heritage, the story is a bit different. While the Windy City won’t be hosting any matches, its connection to the World Cup runs deep, from its iconic role in 1994 to potential fan celebrations in 2026. In this blog post, we’ll explore Chicago’s past, present, and future ties to the beautiful game, diving into why it stepped back from hosting, what fans can expect, and how the tournament might still impact the city. Whether you’re a die-hard supporter or a casual viewer, Chicago’s soccer scene promises to keep the World Cup spirit alive.
Introduction to the 2026 FIFA World Cup
The 2026 World Cup marks a historic milestone as the first to be co-hosted by three nations, featuring 104 matches across 16 cities. This expansion from 32 to 48 teams means more drama, more underdog stories, and more opportunities for global unity through sport. The tournament will run from June 11 to July 19, 2026, culminating in the final at MetLife Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey. For the U.S., this is only the second time hosting since 1994, and it’s expected to draw millions of visitors, boosting economies and elevating soccer’s profile in a country where it’s rapidly growing.
Overview of Host Cities and Venues
The host cities were finalized in 2022, with 11 in the U.S.: Atlanta (Mercedes-Benz Stadium), Boston (Gillette Stadium), Dallas (AT&T Stadium), Houston (NRG Stadium), Kansas City (Arrowhead Stadium), Los Angeles (SoFi Stadium), Miami (Hard Rock Stadium), New York/New Jersey (MetLife Stadium), Philadelphia (Lincoln Financial Field), San Francisco Bay Area (Levi’s Stadium), and Seattle (Lumen Field). Canada contributes Vancouver and Toronto, while Mexico adds Mexico City, Guadalajara, and Monterrey. These venues were chosen for their capacity, infrastructure, and ability to handle massive crowds—many are NFL stadiums adapted for soccer. Notably absent from the list is Chicago, which withdrew its bid early on due to concerns over financial risks and FIFA’s demands. This decision, made under then-Mayor Rahm Emanuel in 2018, prioritized taxpayer protection over the prestige of hosting.
The selection process was rigorous, involving bids from over 20 U.S. cities before narrowing down. Factors like stadium size (minimum 40,000 seats for group stages), transportation, and hotel availability played key roles. For Chicago, Soldier Field’s capacity of around 61,500 was adequate, but other issues, including renovation needs and contractual disputes with FIFA, led to the pullout. Despite this, the tournament’s scale—expected to generate billions in revenue—will ripple across the continent, including non-host cities like Chicago.
Chicago’s World Cup History: A Foundation of Soccer Excellence
Chicago’s absence in 2026 doesn’t erase its storied past with the World Cup. The city has long been a hub for soccer in the U.S., home to diverse immigrant communities that fuel passion for the sport. From youth leagues to professional teams like the Chicago Fire FC, soccer thrives here. But nothing cemented Chicago’s place in World Cup lore like the 1994 tournament.
The 1994 FIFA World Cup: Chicago’s Shining Moment
On June 17, 1994, the eyes of the world turned to Soldier Field as the U.S. hosted its first World Cup. The opening ceremony was a spectacle, featuring Oprah Winfrey as emcee and a memorable (if off-key) performance by Diana Ross, who famously missed a penalty kick during her act but still charmed the crowd. The inaugural match pitted defending champions Germany against Bolivia, with Germany winning 1-0 in front of 63,117 fans. Chicago hosted five games in total: three group-stage matches, one round-of-16 clash (Germany vs. Belgium, 3-2), and became a symbol of soccer’s arrival in America.
The 1994 World Cup shattered attendance records, drawing over 3.5 million spectators across nine U.S. cities, with an average of nearly 69,000 per game—the highest in tournament history. For Chicago, it was transformative. Soldier Field underwent renovations, including temporary grass installation over its artificial turf, to meet FIFA standards. The event boosted local tourism, with fans from around the globe filling hotels, restaurants, and bars. It also sparked a surge in youth soccer participation, laying the groundwork for Major League Soccer (MLS), which launched in 1996 with the Chicago Fire as a charter team.
Beyond the pitch, 1994 highlighted cultural exchanges. Chicago’s neighborhoods, from Pilsen to Little Italy, hosted watch parties and festivals, blending American tailgating with international flair. The tournament’s success proved skeptics wrong—many doubted soccer’s appeal in the U.S.—and set the stage for future growth. As one historian noted, it was “the most important weekend in our soccer history.” Fast-forward to today, and that legacy endures, with Soldier Field still hosting international friendlies and MLS games.
Lessons from 1994 for Modern Soccer in Chicago
The 1994 experience taught valuable lessons about logistics and community involvement. Traffic management around Soldier Field was a challenge, but the city’s public transit shone, ferrying fans via the L trains. Economically, the World Cup injected millions into Chicago’s economy through visitor spending. However, it also exposed costs: stadium upgrades and security strained budgets. These insights likely influenced the 2026 bid decision, emphasizing sustainability over spectacle.
Why Chicago Isn’t Hosting the 2026 World Cup
Despite initial interest—Chicago was named a potential host in the United 2026 bid in 2017—the city opted out early. This choice reflects a broader trend where cities weigh the glamour of hosting against real-world burdens.
The Bid Process and Chicago’s Withdrawal
The bidding for 2026 began in earnest in 2017, with a joint North American proposal from the U.S., Canada, and Mexico. Chicago’s Soldier Field was initially included among 32 potential venues. However, by March 2018, the city withdrew, citing FIFA’s unwillingness to provide financial assurances. Officials feared taxpayers would bear the brunt of costs for stadium upgrades, security, and infrastructure, potentially exceeding benefits.
FIFA’s demands were stringent: tax exemptions, control over commercial rights, and guarantees against losses. Vancouver and Minneapolis also dropped out for similar reasons. In Chicago, Mayor Emanuel’s administration highlighted the “uncertainty for taxpayers” and FIFA’s opacity. This prescient move avoided potential pitfalls seen in other mega-events, like the Olympics, where hosts often face debt.
Reasons Behind the Decision: Financial and Logistical Concerns
Key factors included Soldier Field’s age and configuration. Built in 1924 and renovated in 2003, it meets capacity but lacks modern amenities some newer stadiums offer. FIFA requires natural grass, which Soldier Field can accommodate but at a cost. Additionally, the Chicago Park District’s ownership complicated negotiations, as FIFA sought long-term control.
Broader issues involved equity. Hosting could exacerbate traffic in the already congested Loop area and strain public resources amid other priorities like education and crime reduction. By withdrawing, Chicago sidestepped risks, allowing focus on local initiatives. As one outlet put it, cities are viewing World Cup hosting as a “poisoned chalice.”
What Chicago Offers for World Cup Fans in 2026
Even without matches, Chicago won’t miss the party. The city’s vibrant soccer community and infrastructure position it as a prime spot for fan experiences.
Fan Zones and Events: Bringing the World Cup to the Streets
FIFA encourages non-host cities to organize fan fests, and Chicago is poised to do so. These free public viewing areas, like those in 1994, could pop up in Grant Park or Millennium Park, featuring giant screens, live music, and food trucks. With the tournament airing on FOX and FS1, bars in Wrigleyville and Logan Square will host watch parties, creating electric atmospheres.
Local organizations, including the Chicago Fire FC, may collaborate on events. Imagine soccer clinics for kids, cultural festivals celebrating participating nations, or even pop-up matches in neighborhoods. As the Club World Cup in 2025 serves as a preview, Chicago could host related activations to build hype. These efforts ensure fans feel connected, turning the city into a soccer hub.
Chicago’s Thriving Local Soccer Culture
Chicago’s soccer scene is diverse and dynamic. The Chicago Fire, playing at Soldier Field, draws passionate crowds, while leagues like the National Premier Soccer League foster grassroots talent. Communities from Polish to Mexican heritage host tournaments, reflecting the World Cup’s global appeal. In 2026, expect increased enrollment in youth programs and merchandise sales as excitement builds.
Venues like Toyota Park (now SeatGeek Stadium) could host friendly matches or training sessions for visiting teams, indirectly benefiting from the tournament.
Nearby Host Cities: Travel Options for Chicago Fans
Proximity to host cities makes it easy for Chicagoans to join the action. Flights and trains connect seamlessly.
Kansas City: The Closest Option
Just a six-hour drive or short flight away, Kansas City hosts group games and a quarterfinal at Arrowhead Stadium. Known for barbecue and jazz, it’s an affordable road trip destination. Amtrak’s Lincoln Service offers convenient travel, allowing fans to catch matches without international hassle.
Other Accessible Venues
Dallas and Houston are quick flights south, while Toronto is reachable via train or plane. For West Coast games in LA or Seattle, O’Hare’s hub status simplifies logistics. Group travel packages could make these trips budget-friendly, extending Chicago’s World Cup reach.
Economic and Cultural Impact on Chicago
Not hosting spares Chicago direct costs but doesn’t eliminate benefits. Tourism could surge with fans using the city as a base, exploring landmarks like the Bean or Navy Pier between games. Hotels and restaurants might see a 10-20% uptick in summer bookings.
Culturally, the World Cup promotes inclusivity, strengthening Chicago’s multicultural fabric. Soccer’s growth could lead to infrastructure investments, like new fields, benefiting long-term health and community.
However, challenges include potential overcrowding at airports and minor economic leakage to host cities. Overall, the impact is positive, amplifying 1994’s legacy without the fiscal strain.
How to Prepare for the 2026 World Cup in Chicago
As the current date is August 13, 2025, preparations are underway. Ticket applications open September 10, 2025, via FIFA’s portal—act fast for popular matches. Join local fan groups on social media for event updates.
Stock up on team jerseys, plan watch parties, and explore apps for live scores. For travelers, book flights early to nearby cities. Chicago’s public transit will handle any influx, but consider biking or walking to venues.
Conclusion: Chicago’s Enduring World Cup Spirit
The 2026 World Cup may bypass Chicago for matches, but the city’s heart beats with soccer passion. From 1994’s triumphs to anticipated fan fests, Chicago embodies the sport’s unifying power. As the tournament approaches, embrace the excitement—whether cheering in a bar or road-tripping to a game. The beautiful game thrives here, proving you don’t need to host to celebrate.