EXPOSE HIM! Traitor John McCain went Behind Trumps Back To Sabotage Trump’s Pardon For Joe Arpaio

Traitor John McCain went Behind Trumps Back To Sabotage Trump’s Pardon For Joe Arpaio
There is but one RINO in Washington that should really shut his treasonous trap before the entire conservative side of the country comes out against him. John McCain is once again spewing hypocritical diatribe on Twitter, ironically after stating that President Trump should avoid Twitter. This time he says that “No one is above the law,” pertaining to the Presidential pardon of Sheriff Joe Arpaio.McCain Treason

Wait one second! I bet everyone else’s mind literally went haywire as did my own. I would very much like to respond to the Huffington Post’s inflammatory and pandering article on this subject, but first, read what the Liberal newsrag has to say about it.Soon afterward he added, “Notice that illegal immigrants will be ...

The Huffington Post article in question :

Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) harshly criticized President Donald Trump for pardoning Joe Arpaio, the former Maricopa County, Arizona, sheriff who was found guilty of criminal contempt after illegally targeting Latinos.

Trump’s pardon Friday of Arpaio, who was found to have “willfully violated” a 2011 court order barring him from detaining individuals based solely on suspicion about their legal status, was the first of his presidency.

McCain issued a statement after Trump’s announcement, saying it undermined the president’s professed respect for the rule of law.
“No one is above the law and the individuals entrusted with the privilege of being sworn law officers should always seek to be beyond reproach in their commitment to fairly enforcing the laws they swore to uphold,” McCain said in the statement. “Mr. Arpaio was found guilty of criminal contempt for continuing to illegally profile Latinos living in Arizona based on their perceived immigration status in violation of a judge’s orders. The President has the authority to make this pardon, but doing so at this time undermines his claim for the respect of rule of law as Mr. Arpaio has shown no remorse for his actions.”

... Nixon pardoned John McCain for treason that circulated on Facebook

Arpaio supported Trump during the presidential campaign last year and both men have promoted the lie that former President Barack Obama was not born in the United States. The White House defended the pardon by saying the 85-year-old Arpaio had history working in law enforcement.

McCain cast the decisive vote last month to block a Republican effort in the Senate to try and repeal the Affordable Care Act, dealing a devastating defeat to Trump and his own party. In 2015, Trump suggested McCain, who was a prisoner of war during the Vietnam War, wasn’t really a war hero.

My response is this :

1- There was no illegal targeting per say. Joe Arpaio was given a job and he fullfilled it. Illegals are illegals and they have no rights under our constitution. Boot them out by any means necessary.

2- Obama showed his disrespect for the law AND the American people by pardoning hundreds of murderous criminals, including but not limited to Muslim terrorists who went right back to plans of blowing us up! I don’t recall McCain being upset about that.

3- No one is above the law? Yet McCain himself was pardoned for treason and war crimes against his own men in Vietnam. Oh, and lets not forget the murdering of over 130 men on the ship he tried to sink when he pulled a wet-start KNOWINGLY with his jet engine! His willful engagement with the Vietnamese to ambush and murder American soldiers should be mentioned as well. Then there is his support of allowing Hillary to walk free of all crimes she has committed. I could go on, but you get the picture.

So to the HP I say, learn your facts before spewing false rhetoric for the masses of braindead zombies you call followers. To McCain I say, shut up and step down because you, being the biggest traitor this country has ever seen, disqualifies you from having any rights to any government seat and should very much be imposed. You should be imprisoned for your crimes against this country from the murders of our soldiers to your pandering in Colorado for more gun control.

... Out America (VIDEO) | McCain-3 | Multimedia Politics Special Interests

On July 25, 2016, “America’s Sheriff” Joe Arpaio was found guilty of misdemeanor criminal contempt without the benefit of a jury of his peers.

Here are a 6 interesting facts that Breitbart News laid out, regarding the Sheriff Joe Arpaio case, that every American crying “foul” over President Trump’s pardon yesterday needs to know: 

The US District judge who tried the case against Sheriff Arpaio was a Bill Clinton appointee. 

1. The guilty ruling, by Bill Clinton-appointed U.S. District Judge Susan Bolton, is the latest chapter of a nearly decade-long saga of legal proceedings against Sheriff Joe initiated by leftist groups opposed to his aggressive policing of illegal aliens.

The charges against 85 year old Arpaio stem from a civil rights suit demanding he cease “racial profiling” in his Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office’s immigration enforcement operations. After a federal judge issued an order demanding certain practices, Arpaio was charged with contempt for continuing to try to enforce the law as he saw fit.

The misdemeanor charge was a ploy to prevent Sheriff Arpaio from having a jury trial. 

2. Because Arpaio was charged only with a misdemeanor punishable by a maximum of six-months in jail, the U.S. Constitution does not guarantee him a right to trial by a jury of his peers. Arpaio and his attorneys repeatedly petitioned for a jury, only to be denied by Judge Bolton in March and again in May. Sources familiar with the proceedings have told Breitbart News the decision to charge only the misdemeanor was likely a ploy by federal prosecutors to avoid a jury trial in the community where Arpaio served as sheriff for more than 20 years

According to the NCPD President, the DOJ had no evidence to make their case against Sheriff Arpaio.

3. National Center for Police Defense (NCPD) President James Fotis, who was present in the courtroom, was highly skeptical a Phoenix jury could have ever found Arpaio guilty. He told Breitbart News:

I sat through three days of testimony and it was clear from the beginning that the DOJ had no evidence to make their case. In fact, all of the DOJ’s witnesses made it clear that Judge Snow’s order was unclear and ambiguous. There is no way a jury would have determined that the Sheriff willfully and intentionally violated the judge’s order.

“Judge Bolton’s ruling has caused me to lose my faith in the court system and the federal judicial system,” Fotis added in a NCPD press release.

Over 40,000 signatures were gathered on a petition by current and former law enforcement officers in support of Sheriff Joe Arpaio who they claimed spent his entire career upholding and defending the Constitution. 

4. Fotis was hardly the first or only commentator to question the impartiality of Arpaio’s prosecution. In June, his group managed to assemble over 40,000 signatures from current and former law enforcement officers in support of Arpaio, delivering them to the Department of Justice in Washington, DC. “After devoting 56-years of his life to upholding and defending the Constitution, Sheriff Arpaio deserves our nation’s eternal gratitude — not jail time,” those petitions read.

The Judge in the case should have recused himself, but refused to do so. 

5. The initial racial profiling suit that eventually led to this conviction also took on political dimensions and its conduct was criticized. The judge in that case, G. Murray Snow, ignored calls to recuse himself based on the fact his brother-in-law is a partner at Covington & Burling, the firm representing those suing Arpaio and the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office.

President Obama spent much of his 8 years in office trying to find a way to take down America’s toughest Sheriff on illegal immigrants, who also headed up an independent investigation into the alleged fake birth certificate that would prove Barack Obama was not born in the United States. 

6. The decision to criminally prosecute Arpaio was taken while the DOJ was run by Attorney General Loretta Lynch. It would be highly unusual for new leadership to intervene and drop an ongoing prosecution, and no such step was taken, despite the aforementioned petitions.

Liberals went nuts yesterday, after President Trump granted 85-year old Sheriff Joe Arpaio a pardon. Many of those on the left thumbed their nose at the Constitution for 8 years, while Barack Obama committed one of the most unconstitutional acts ever by a president, when he forced Americans to buy insurance. Suddenly, they were all of a sudden concerned about the possibility that President Trump may not have adhered to our Constitution when he pardoned America’s toughest Sheriff on illegal immigration.

Even the New York Times, who helped to sell Barack Obama’s horrific Obamacare plan is concerned about Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s pardon.

Good case for  to be considered unconstitutional.
Of course, we’d need a congress with a spine first https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/24/opinion/trump-arpaio-pardon-arizona-sheriff.html 

Sheriff Joe Arpaio endorsed Donald Trump at a rally in Marshalltown, Iowa, in 2016.

Opinion | A Pardon for Arpaio Would Put Trump in Uncharted Territory

If the president can immunize government agents who violate constitutional rights, there will be no limit on his power.

nytimes.com

... Bernie Sanders, Jane Sanders Under FBI Investigation… for Bank Fraud
Bernie Sanders is a degenerate a Communist scumbag will say anything his political masters want leading to his own enrichment.... illegal immigration into the U.S. is actually contrary to his own vote

Attorney Dario Navarro was one of several leftists who were all of a sudden concerned about the “constitutionality” of President Trump’s actions.

full story

Sheriff Joe Arpaio responds to attacks from Bernie Sanders